 |
Open Letter
to Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk Opposing U.S. Military Base
in Poland
Please join these organizations and individuals
listed below in signing the open letter to Prime Minister Tusk.
To add your name, go to the Campaign for Peace and Democracy's page,
here.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk
The Republic of Poland
Dear Prime Minister Tusk,
We are writing you as individuals and organizations
based in the United States committed to human rights and peaceful
relations among nations. We have been dismayed by the attempts of
both the Polish and Czech governments to negotiate deals with the
Bush administration to establish military bases in your countries
despite the fact that these bases are opposed by a majority of your
own people. The U.S. bases threaten to restart a Cold War between
the United States and Russia. They have nothing to do with genuine
defense and much to do with an aggressive U.S. military policy.
The proposed bases -- ten interceptor missiles
in Poland and a radar in the Czech Republic -- combine to produce
a dangerous military escalation. The U.S. government claims that
the anti-missile system is aimed against Iran, but there is no credible
evidence that a missile threat from Iran today exists. As far as
Poland is concerned, in January of this year your own Foreign Affairs
Minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, said publicly, "This is an American,
not a Polish project. We feel no threat from Iran."
The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate released
in December 2007 undermined any remaining credibility for the claim
of a proximate Iranian nuclear threat by stating that Iran had discontinued
its nuclear weapons program in the fall of 2003. And far from protecting
against such a threat in the future, the anti-missile system and
other nuclear escalations will only create even stronger inducements
for Iran to seek nuclear weapons.
A radar station in the Czech Republic and ten
missile interceptors in Poland don't constitute an immediate challenge
to Russia's nuclear deterrent, with its thousands of warheads. But
there is a clear long-range threat that these U.S. bases will be
upgraded. Official U.S. documents bear this out. National Security
Presidential Directive 23, signed by President Bush on Dec. 6, 2002,
stated that the United States would begin to set up missile defenses
in 2004 "as a starting point for fielding improved and expanded
missile defenses later." This presidential directive was preceded
in January 2002 by a memorandum from Donald Rumsfeld, at the time
Secretary of Defense, directing the Missile Defense Agency to develop
defense systems by using whatever technology is "available,"
even if the capabilities produced are limited relative to what the
system must ultimately be able to do.
Washington's scheme has already produced an ominous
response from Russia, which has threatened to direct its missiles
toward Poland and the Czech Republic if the U.S. proceeds with the
system. Moscow has also threatened to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range
Nuclear Forces Treaty and to suspend participation in a treaty limiting
the deployment of conventional forces in Europe.
No nation -- including the U.S., Russia, and
Iran -- has the moral right to possess nuclear weapons, which by
their nature are weapons of vast and indiscriminate mass destruction.
The U.S. and other nuclear powers can best reduce the danger of
nuclear warfare by taking major steps toward both nuclear and conventional
disarmament and refraining from waging or threatening "preventive"
war -- not by expanding the nuclear threat. Such steps by the existing
nuclear powers would create a political climate that would powerfully
discourage new countries from developing their own nuclear weapons.
The only objection your government seems to be
raising to the US missile system is that Washington is not offering
enough in the way of military modernization for Poland. But the
provocative bases are wrong on principle, and we would all be simultaneously
safer and more prosperous if both Washington and Warsaw invested
in social needs rather than new weaponry.
The democratic movements of 1989 are dishonored
by the attempt to integrate the countries of central Europe into
the network of more than 700 U.S. military bases around the world.
We stand with today's popular movements in Poland and the Czech
Republic that are refusing to cave in to the pressure from the Bush
Administration to accept this dangerous anti-missile system. And
we welcome their support for our work for a new democratic, just
and peaceful U.S. foreign policy.
SIGNED BY:
Organizations:
• Campaign for Peace and Democracy
• Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
• Humanist Movement - U.S.
• Physicians for Social Responsibility/NYC
• Peace Action (National and New York State)
Individuals
Anthony Arnove, Stanley Aronowitz,
Phyllis Bennis, Norman Birnbaum, Eileen Boris, Laura Boylan, Jeremy
Brecher, Vinie Burrows, Leslie Cagan, Noam Chomsky, Joshua Cohen,
Margaret W. Crane, Gail Daneker, Marie Dennis, Ariel Dorfman, Carolyn
Eisenberg, Gertrude Ezorsky, Richard Falk, Cathey E. Falvo, MD,
MPH, Samuel Farber, John Feffer, Barry Finger, Robert Gabrielsky,
Bruce K. Gagnon, Akbar Ganji, John Gorman, Thomas Harrison, Nader
Hashemi, Judith Hempfling, Michael Hirsch, Adam Hochschild, Doug
Ireland, Padraic Kennedy, Joanne Landy, Jesse Lemisch, John Leonard,
Sue Leonard, Staughton Lynd, Nelson Lichtenstein, Marvin and Betty
Mandell, David McReynolds, Kevin Martin, Timothy Mitchell, David
Oakford, David Ost, Mary O'Brien, MD, Rosemarie Pace, Christopher
Phelps, Katha Pollitt, Danny Postel, Leonard Rodberg, Jennifer Scarlott,
Jason Schulman, Stephen R. Shalom, Alice Slater, Meredith Tax, Lois
Weiner, Naomi Weisstein, Chris Wells, Cheryl Wertz, Reginald Wilson,
Julia Wrigley, and Howard Zinn.
If you have difficulty signing on at
the website, please send an email with your name and affiliation
(for identification only) to: cpd@igc.org
|