Take
Action for a Nuclear Weapons Free World
Abolishing nuclear arms would
enhance global security
By Jake Garn
The Salt Lake Tribune
11/28/2008
After a tragedy we often ask: Why did this happen?
How did this happen? Could we have prevented it? The tragedies of
Sept. 11, 2001, still raise these questions.
In looking ahead as much as looking back, imagine
how much worse those losses would have been if the terrorists had
used a nuclear weapon.
For decades, nuclear weapons were thought to make
us safer by deterring the first strike by another nation. Today
we need to re-evaluate the roles and dangers of nuclear weapons
in the world. Let's ask ourselves: Does it help the United States
to have nuclear weapons? Would the whole world be safer if no one
and no nation had even one of these weapons? Is the mere existence
of nuclear weapons a threat?
We believe today that the possession of nuclear
weapons actually diminishes our safety. We agree with former cabinet
members and a senator, Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, William Perry
and Sam Nunn, that our world will be safer when all nuclear weapons
have been abolished and that the complete eradication of nuclear
weapons should therefore be a high priority of our government.
One of the steps those four distinguished men
urge is to increase the warning and decision times before any weapons
can be used against another country. Currently, both the United
States and Russia maintain about one-third of their strategic arsenals
on launch-ready alert. This means that both countries remain in
a Cold War posture in which they would launch massive numbers of
weapons to prevent the other country from using its weapons.
Besides encouraging still more nations to develop
nuclear weapons, this outdated deterrence posture increases the
possibility that a terrorist group could obtain use of a weapon,
either through hacking into a weapon-owning country's computer launch
systems or stealing a weapon in transit (Russia constantly moves
some of its missile force on transport launchers.)
In fact, there is already a successful precedent
for the United States to initiate taking weapons off alert status.
At the end of September 1991, President George H. W. Bush ordered
an immediate stand-down of U.S. strategic bombers that for decades
had stood ready for takeoff within 15 minutes.
Following discussion with Soviet Premier Mikhail
Gorbachev, 450 Minuteman missiles were "safed" in their
silos by flipping a switch to isolate the missiles from remote launch.
One of the easiest steps is to change our policy
to increase the decision-making time before launching nuclear weapons.
More time would then be available to double check for possible computer
malfunctions.
We can also take physical steps to increase the
time it takes for a weapon to be launched. For example, today's
modern Minuteman missiles can be "safed" in their silos,
much as the older Minuteman missiles were safed in late 1991 at
the time of the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Fortunately, President-elect Barack Obama supports
the broad goal of eliminating all nuclear weapons. Strong citizen
and congressional support will be needed for the new president to
take steps toward nuclear arms reduction.
President-elect Obama will need to reach out to
Russia to negotiate the reduction in the nuclear arsenals of both
countries. Then we can realistically invite all relevant nations
to craft a lasting treaty for the abolition of nuclear arms. This
would be a giant step toward true global as well as U.S. security.
Jake Garn, a self-employed consultant, was mayor
of Salt Lake City before representing Utah in the U.S. Senate from
1974 to 1992. John W. Bennion, a signatory, was superintendent of
the Salt Lake City School District. |